- #Lucida sans unicode lucida grande sans serif mac os x#
- #Lucida sans unicode lucida grande sans serif windows#
In terms of changing to another font family, yes it will be a major pain in the tuchas, if you need to go to such a “plan B” I certainly would not limit myself to Microsoft's system fonts. Maybe you would like the screen rendering of the OpenType CFF version of Lucida Sans better, maybe not. Adobe shipped a Type 1 version of the font many years ago and then reissued the font as an OpenType CFF font (OpenType format with Type 1 font outlines) with its last major revision in 2002.
#Lucida sans unicode lucida grande sans serif windows#
The version that ships with Windows is a TrueType version dating back at latest to 1999 (based on the time stamp on the font file). (2) There are multiple versions of Lucida Sans available. Otherwise we would only have one serif and one sans serif font! That's OK! It's perfectly fine to be subjective about fonts. (1) The rendering of Lucida Sans on a higher resolution screen actually may be a more accurate rendering of the font given the extra pixels available for such rendering, you actually can see it better and more than you might when perusing paper, and in fact you really don't like the design. There is something inconsistent in your description, though! Given that you find Lucida Sans performing well for print (assuming 600 or 1200dpi) and conceivably OK for low resolution screens, it makes little technical sense that it wouldn't perform better on higher resolution screens than on lower resolution screens. What was loved and leading edge 28 years ago may not be that well regarded today. However, times change, technology changes, and tastes change.
In 1985 when I was working for Imagen, an early laser printer vendor, we very successfully bundled Lucida and Lucida Sans with our 240 and 300dpi products. In terms of yielding well-rendered text on low resolution laser printers, Lucida and Lucida Sans was fairly successful. Note that at that time, especially given the very low resolution of computer CRT screens and lack of processor speed and memory, screen display was normally done with hand-tuned bitmap fonts on-the-fly screen rendering was not feasible.
The design of these typefaces was done to specifically address the issues of renderability and readability with the 240 to 300dpi laser printers of the day, not necessarily for screen reading. Letters in the International Phonetic Alphabet, particularly upside down letters, are aligned for easy reading upside down.The Lucida and Lucida Sans family of typefaces were designed back in 1985 by Charles Bigelow and Chris Holmes.
#Lucida sans unicode lucida grande sans serif mac os x#
A nearly identical font, called Lucida Grande, ships as the default system font with Apple's Mac OS X operating system, until switching to Helvetica Neue in 2014 with OS X Yosemite, and in addition to the above, also supports Arabic and Thai scripts. The font comes pre-installed with all Microsoft Windows versions since Windows 98. It was designed by Kris Holmes and Charles Bigelow in 1993, and was first shipped with the Microsoft Windows NT 3.1 operating system. It is the first Unicode encoded font to include non-Latin scripts. It is a sans-serif variant of the Lucida font family and supports Latin, Greek, Cyrillic and Hebrew scripts, as well as all the letters used in the International Phonetic Alphabet. In digital typography, Lucida Sans Unicode OpenType font from the design studio of Bigelow & Holmes is designed to support the most commonly used characters defined in version 1.0 of the Unicode standard.
0 kommentar(er)
